Overview

Industrial Biotechnology

Row

Publications in DiVA 2020
(fractional counts)

6.4

WoS coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

86.6 %

Scopus coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

95.7 %

Row

Notes more…

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Overall Web of Science coverage for peer reviewed publications in this unit is good, 86.6%.

Note that the coverage numbers for Web of Science and Scopus apply to publications in the KTH bibliometric database Bibmet. If a WoS-id or Scoupus-id from DiVA can not be matched in Bibmet, it does not count as covered.

Row

Background

The bibliometric indicators referred are based on publications registered in DiVA. Only publications from currently employed researchers at KTH are included. The rolling nature of this report means that it provides more of a current overview and less of a historic stable trend, since it excludes publications written by researchers that are no longer affiliated to KTH, but have been at some point in time.

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Row

Researchers at the unit

Publication data is available only after login.

Publications in DiVA

Industrial Biotechnology

Row

Fractional count

Publication volume, fractionalized

Publication volume, fractionalized

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 3.0 6 4.5 4.2 4.1 4.8 4.1 30.5 87.1% 1.0
Article, other 0.4 NA NA NA 0.2 0.6 0.2 1.4 100.0% 0.3
Conference paper, peer review NA NA NA NA NA 0.2 0.5 0.8 66.7% 1.0
Conference paper, other NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.2 0.2 0.0% 0.0
Chapter in book 0.9 1 NA 0.3 NA NA 0.3 2.6 0.0% 0.5
Doctoral thesis NA NA NA 1.0 NA NA 1.0 2.0 0.0% 0.0

Full count

Publication volume, full count

Publication volume, full count

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 13 23 18 18 24 17 16 129 95.3% 1
Article, other 2 NA NA NA 1 2 1 6 100.0% 0
Conference paper, peer review NA NA NA NA NA 1 2 3 66.7% 1
Conference paper, other NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 1 0.0% 0
Chapter in book 2 1 NA 1 NA NA 1 5 0.0% 1
Doctoral thesis NA NA NA 1 NA NA 1 2 0.0% 0

Row

Publication volume

Publication volume

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Citation impact

Industrial Biotechnology

Row

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 2.8 12.0 4.4 0.2 7.3%
2015 4.0 21.2 5.4 0.0 0.0%
2016 4.5 27.6 6.2 0.4 9.3%
2017 2.8 65.4 23.2 0.0 0.0%
2018 3.9 30.6 7.8 0.4 10.1%
Total 17.9 156.7 8.7 1.0 5.7%

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Cf Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 11.2 0.85 0.8 7.6%
2015-2017 11.3 1.00 1.4 12.3%
2016-2018 11.2 1.06 1.4 12.7%
2017-2019 11.1 0.96 0.9 8.3%
Total 22.3 0.91 1.8 7.9%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article, Proceedings paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 12 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 66.5%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 51 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 77.2%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)

Row

Average field normalized citations (Cf)

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal impact

Industrial Biotechnology

Row

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Journal Cf Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 11.2 1.13 2.9 25.8%
2015-2017 11.3 1.18 3.2 28.8%
2016-2018 11.2 1.13 3.5 30.9%
2017-2019 11.1 1.08 2.9 26.0%
2018-2020 12.6 0.99 2.5 19.6%
Total 26.6 1.08 6.7 25.0%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 51 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 77.2%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)

Row

Field normalized journal impact (JCf)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

Industrial Biotechnology

Row

Summary

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

Publication years Publications Swedish non-university co-publications Share Swedish non-university International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 51 3 5.9% 32 62.7%
2015-2017 55 3 5.5% 37 67.3%
2016-2018 57 3 5.3% 35 61.4%
2017-2019 55 7 12.7% 34 61.8%
2018-2020 56 10 17.9% 33 58.9%
Total 123 13 10.6% 76 61.8%

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 51 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 93.2%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)

International and Swedish non-university co‑publication

Countries and organizations

Co‑publication countries

Co‑publication countries

Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
Netherlands 24 22 2 0 0 3.4
Bolivia 6 6 0 0 0 1.8
Germany 10 9 1 0 0 1.3
Austria 8 8 0 0 0 1.2
United Kingdom 7 3 4 0 0 1.1
Korea, Republic of 3 3 0 0 0 0.9
United States 5 5 0 0 0 0.8
Denmark 3 2 1 0 0 0.7
Italy 3 3 0 0 0 0.7
Japan 5 4 1 0 0 0.6
Australia 4 4 0 0 0 0.6
Latvia 2 2 0 0 0 0.6
Estonia 4 4 0 0 0 0.6
Luxembourg 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
Pakistan 3 3 0 0 0 0.4
Spain 3 3 0 0 0 0.4
India 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Mexico 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Brazil 3 2 1 0 0 0.3
Belgium 2 2 0 0 0 0.2
Kenya 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
France 2 1 1 0 0 0.2
China 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
South Africa 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Hungary 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Ireland 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Romania 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Viet Nam 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Finland 2 0 2 0 0 0.1
Colombia 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Argentina 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Poland 1 0 1 0 0 0.1

Co‑publication organizations

Co‑publication countries

Organization Organization type Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
Delft University of Technology University Netherlands 21 20 1 0 0 2.9
Albanova University Centre University Other Sweden 7 7 0 0 0 2.1
Karolinska Institutet University Sweden 11 10 1 0 0 1.9
University of San Simon University Bolivia 6 6 0 0 0 1.8
Pharem Biotech Company Sweden 5 5 0 0 0 1.2
Stockholm University University Sweden 5 4 1 0 0 1.0
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences University Sweden 8 7 1 0 0 1.0
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology University Korea, Republic of 3 3 0 0 0 0.9
Uppsala University University Sweden 4 4 0 0 0 0.9
AstraZeneca Company United Kingdom 4 1 3 0 0 0.7
DSM Company Netherlands 4 4 0 0 0 0.6
Riga Technical University (RTU) University Latvia 2 2 0 0 0 0.6
University of Groningen University Netherlands 5 4 1 0 0 0.6
University of Tartu University Estonia 4 4 0 0 0 0.6
University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Institute Austria 4 4 0 0 0 0.5
Mid Sweden University University Sweden 3 3 0 0 0 0.5
University of Greifswald University Germany 4 3 1 0 0 0.5
Belach Bioteknik Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST) Institute Luxembourg 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
PerfuseCell A/S Company Denmark 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
COMSATS University University Pakistan 3 3 0 0 0 0.4
Griffith University University Australia 3 3 0 0 0 0.4
Lund University University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.4
Electrospinning Company Ltd Company United Kingdom 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Kymab NA United Kingdom 2 1 1 0 0 0.4
Centro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados (Cimav) Institute Mexico 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Darmstadt University of Technology University Germany 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
Chalmers University of Technology University Sweden 2 1 1 0 0 0.3
Linköping University University Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
National Research Council (CNR) Other Public Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Vienna University of Technology University Austria 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
State University of Campinas University Brazil 3 2 1 0 0 0.3
Ctr Adv Bioprod Continuous Proc AdBIOPRO NA Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Baylor College of Medicine University United States 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
Cobra Biologics Company Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
GE Healthcare Company Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
Sojo University University Japan 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
Umeå University University Sweden 3 2 1 0 0 0.3
EntreChem, S.L. Company Spain 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
AdBIOPRO Competence Ctr Adv BioProd Continuous P NA Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Eindhoven University of Technology University Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Lab on a Bead AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Lab4life Bio Research Private Limited Company India 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
PE Bioprocess Consulting AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Politecnico di Milano University Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Spiber Technology AB NA Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Maryland, College Park University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Ghent University University Belgium 2 2 0 0 0 0.2
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Other Public Australia 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe) Institute Kenya 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Macquarie University University Australia 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
SARom Biostructure AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
ViaZym Company Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Yamagata University University Japan 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Anna University University India 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Austrian Institute of Technology Institute Austria 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Competence Ctr Adv Bioprod Continuous Proc NA Sweden 1 0 1 0 0 0.2
Genomatica Company United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna University Austria 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of the Basque country (UPV/EHU) University Spain 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Wallenberg Ctr Prot Res WCPR NA Sweden 1 0 1 0 0 0.2
East China University of Science and Technology University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Evolva Biotech Company Denmark 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Max Planck Society for the Advancement of Science (MPG) Institute Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Netherlands Forensic Institute Institute Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Polytechnic University of Turin University Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Radboud University Nijmegen University Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Saromics Biostructures AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Pretoria University South Africa 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Applikon Biotechnol BV NA Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Babes-Bolyai University (UBB) University Romania 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Budapest University of Technology and Economics University Hungary 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Fermentia Ltd.  Company Hungary 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Hungarian Academy of Sciences Other Hungary 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Karolinska University Hospital University Hospital Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Riffyn Inc Company United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
SynBiocat Ltd.  Company Hungary 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Limerick University Ireland 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology Institute Viet Nam 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Helsinki University Finland 2 0 2 0 0 0.1
Center for Structural Systems Biology (CSSB) Institute Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL) Other Public Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Jacobs University Bremen (JU) Institute Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
the Basque foundation for science (Ikerbasque) Other Public Spain 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
The Centre for Cooperative Research in Biomaterials (CIC biomaGUNE) Institute Spain 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Graz University Austria 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Los Andes (Uniandes) University Colombia 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Heinrich Heine Univ Düsseldorf University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Isobionics B.V. Company Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
National University of Rosario University Argentina 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Saarland University University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Montpellier University France 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Tokyo University Japan 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Universidade de São Paulo University Brazil 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Bio-Prodict Company Netherlands 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
GammaDelta Therapeut Ltd NA United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Technical University of Denmark (DTU) University Denmark 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
National Institute of Agricultural Research (INRA) Institute France 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Innventia AB Institute Sweden 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Kyoto University University Japan 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Umeå Plant Science Centre (UPSC) University Sweden 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of Bialystok University Poland 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of Cambridge University United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.1

Open Access

Industrial Biotechnology

Row

Open Access publications, full counts

Open Access publications, full counts

Publication Year Publications Open Access publications OA gold OA hybrid OA green OA bronze Not OA Share OA
2014 13 5 2 0 2 1 8 38.5%
2015 24 15 7 5 1 2 9 62.5%
2016 18 9 5 4 0 0 9 50.0%
2017 17 17 8 4 1 4 0 100.0%
2018 25 18 5 7 3 3 7 72.0%
2019 18 16 5 9 1 1 2 88.9%
2020 19 14 3 9 2 0 5 73.7%
Total 134 94 35 38 10 11 40 70.1%

Row

Notes more…

The Open Access type of the publications was fetched from the Unpaywall REST API. The method to determine the OA type is presented here.

In summary, the different OA types can be described as follows:

  • Gold: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is fully OA.

  • Hybrid: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is not fully OA.

  • Green: The full text has been found in an institutional repository, such as DiVA.

  • Bronze: The full text has been found on a publisher website but no OA license could be identified.

N.B.: This table is based on peer-reviewed publications for which Unpaywall could determine the OA type (necessary condition: have a DOI number). Unpaywall’s method is empirical and does not strictly equate to copyright license. As a consequence, the OA status of a given publication may vary with time — for example turning from “Not OA” to “Green” when a full text is added to DiVA.

Row

Overview of Open Access publications - piechart

Stacked area chart for publications

Scopus

Industrial Biotechnology

Row

Citation Impact

Column

Citations, open window
Citations, open window
Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 3.0 46.9 15.9 0.0 0.0%
2015 5.0 77.7 15.7 0.0 0.0%
2016 4.3 80.1 18.8 0.0 0.0%
2017 2.8 126.6 44.8 0.0 0.0%
2018 4.0 43.0 10.6 0.3 6.3%
2019 5.0 24.1 4.8 0.8 14.9%
2020 4.8 10.6 2.2 2.4 50.8%
Total 28.9 409.0 14.1 3.5 11.9%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Conference Paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 13 (full counted) publications with moderate Scopus coverage (at least 67.9%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Average field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Publication years Publications Average FWCI Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 12.2 0.90 0.7 6.0%
2015-2017 12.1 1.03 1.5 12.4%
2016-2018 11.0 1.17 1.8 16.7%
2017-2019 11.8 1.02 1.3 11.3%
Total 24.0 0.96 2.1 8.6%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 54 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 89.5%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal Impact

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Publication years Publications Average SNIP Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 12.2 1.17 5.7 47.1%
2015-2017 12.1 1.20 6.0 49.9%
2016-2018 11.1 1.24 4.9 43.6%
2017-2019 11.9 1.22 3.8 31.5%
2018-2020 13.7 1.16 3.6 26.4%
Total 28.7 1.19 10.8 37.7%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 54 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 89.5%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Field normalized journal impact (SNIP)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
Publication years Publications Corporate co-publications Share corporate International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 52 1 1.9% 33 63.5%
2015-2017 55 1 1.8% 37 67.3%
2016-2018 57 5 8.8% 35 61.4%
2017-2019 58 6 10.3% 33 56.9%
2018-2020 61 11 18.0% 33 54.1%
Total 129 12 9.3% 76 58.9%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 52 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 96.6%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)

International and corporate co‑publication

About

Row